Skip to main content
Blockchain Today

Crypto markets, protocols and policy

OCC leaves stablecoin rewards to case-by-case review

The OCC’s new GENIUS Act rule keeps rewards programs under case-by-case review, leaving crypto platforms room to offer them and banks uncertain about limits.

By Blockchain Today Editorial4 min read

OCC leaves stablecoin rewards to case-by-case review

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s new GENIUS Act rule leaves crypto platforms able to offer stablecoin rewards, but requires the agency to assess each arrangement against the law’s ban on issuers paying interest-like returns to holders. The rule, announced October 21, takes effect January 18, 2027. It does not grant blanket approval to existing rewards programs, according to the CoinDesk report on the final rule.

The distinction matters because the rewards can resemble interest while being paid through an exchange or another platform rather than directly by the stablecoin issuer. The OCC’s rule implements the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, or GENIUS Act, and the agency says it will judge arrangements by the statute and their specific facts.

What does the rule permit platforms to do?

It permits no automatic safe harbor: platforms must have their reward arrangements assessed case by case. The law bars payments made “solely in connection with the holding, use, or retention” of a payment stablecoin, CoinDesk reported, while the OCC indicated that a reward tied partly to other reasons could fall outside that prohibition.

That leaves room for programs tied to activity beyond simply holding a token, but the OCC has not published examples showing where the line falls. Existing programs also receive no special treatment merely because they began before the law. The OCC’s final rule says their prior existence does not establish that they comply.

The rule also removes “rebuttable presumptions” in the earlier proposal that would have treated specified activities as likely violations. Dropping those presumptions changes the review approach, but does not establish that every third-party reward program is permissible. The practical standard will depend on how each program is structured and what the OCC determines it rewards.

How does that differ from the issuer ban?

The GENIUS Act, enacted on July 18, 2025, prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to holders, while the new rule addresses arrangements involving other firms, such as exchanges. Under the OCC’s framework, that separation leaves issuers subject to the direct-payment ban while third-party programs face fact-specific review.

Stablecoins are designed to maintain a steady value, often against the U.S. dollar. Issuers hold reserve assets such as bank deposits and Treasury securities; the interest those assets generate has made rewards a point of dispute between crypto firms and banks. Exchanges can use rewards to attract customers, but the absence of clear examples in the rule leaves businesses with uncertainty about which program designs comply.

The OCC’s final rule covers more than rewards: it sets requirements for reserves, redemption, risk management, audits, reporting and supervision for stablecoin issuers under its jurisdiction. It takes effect on the same date as the GENIUS Act, January 18, 2027, and the OCC says it will coordinate with other agencies on parts of the law outside this rule.

Why are banks challenging the approach?

Banks have argued that stablecoin rewards could draw customer funds away from deposits, which banks use to support lending. The American Bankers Association said the OCC’s decision would threaten funds banks use to make loans, according to the Associated Press report. The OCC’s rule preserves the statutory ban on issuer-paid yield, but does not impose the broader restrictions on platform rewards that banking groups sought.

The competing concerns are concrete: rewards can offer customers an incentive to use stablecoins, while deposits have a different regulatory framework that includes protections such as federal deposit insurance. Stablecoin holdings do not carry that insurance, AP reported. The OCC’s case-by-case approach leaves the competitive question open while it evaluates compliance program by program.

The next signals are the OCC’s early decisions on specific arrangements, any further guidance with examples, and the implementation work by other agencies. Until those arrive, platforms will need to account for the issuer ban and the absence of a blanket exemption for existing rewards.

Sources and documents